If Obama, Kerry, McCain, etc, staked out a position that such and such happened, and if, if it didn't happen that way, how long before they and the intelligence sources they relied on, start to look highly questionable and unreliable?
They are giving Obama a back door to escape from the corner he has painted himself into.
But he is too stupid to use it.
The Obama bots, and McCain and Graham sycophants start putting junk in the keyword section in 3...2...1...
Oh my. The DC elites have no direct evidence, but want to start WW3.
Read the story, not good news still because it seems to imply the Syrian ruling government still is behind the attacks, just people lower in the chain of command.
Not that that would sway me into supporting an attack, the facts just don’t seem to change the basics from what I read.
So THIS is the “irrefutable evidence” we were supposed to believe?
The question I just posed to someone else:
Was this information blocked from key leaders and their subordinates, or was it knowingly ignored?
The reason they’re scared about 2014? Majority to enable impeachment.
Obama ordered it.
What if the rebels had assistance in breaking into the government communication lines with appropriate directives for release authority? Who would do that? No leader would be that cold and heartless, would they?