To: ontap
I would be for taking out either one of them if I thought their replacements would be any better. Sadly by the time numb nuts got on board that ship had sailed. First in Iran when the greens were protesting in the streets and then in Syria when all the terrorist have taken over the movement. Fearless leader suffers from being to slow (stupid) to see farther than a foot and a half in front of his arrogant ass!!!
We should not get involved in civil wars, Middle Eastern or otherwise, unless we or our allies have been attacked, or are about to be attacked.
We are not the world's policemen, and the sooner we realize that, the better off we are.
To: af_vet_rr
We have been under attack by Iran and Syria since the taking of the hostages in the seventies. If we could support a contingency that had the same morays as us I would be alright with it. Sadly thanks to the Kenyan that is no longer an option so I agree with you. We should however not be dissuaded from taking preventive strikes if we feel an attack is eminent!!!
17 posted on
09/08/2013 4:46:34 PM PDT by
ontap
(***)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson