Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: melsec

Thanks! I didn’t realise that both the House and the Senate used preferences. That being said, the senatorial method of letting the parties set the preferences still seems odd.


44 posted on 09/07/2013 2:07:19 AM PDT by mrreaganaut (Coolidge 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: mrreaganaut
That being said, the senatorial method of letting the parties set the preferences still seems odd.

It's a matter of practicality - the number of candidates (my state was 97, and I know NSW was more than that) means requiring people to vote all their preferences means a lot of people would never finish.

46 posted on 09/07/2013 2:10:46 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: mrreaganaut

Well they can but a lot of people this year have taken the option of distributing their own preferences by filling out all the boxes below the line in the Senate. I personally gave my preferences to people I think will stand up against the importation of the Islamic culture - it was my first ‘redneck’ vote and I feel damn good about it!


47 posted on 09/07/2013 2:13:40 AM PDT by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson