Look guy, I explained how it is.
All your pontificating doesn’t change the fact that Romney survived the REPUBLICAN PRIMARIES and was the only choice we had left at that point. What you or I did at that time was washed away when our Candidates of choice didn’t make the big time.
I’m not sure why you seem to have a personal vendetta against me because I told you how it was and is, but enough already.
Romney lost and we are left with the Obama Regime. Get over it. You are acting like I chose Romney over the other Republicans during the Primaries, it didn’t happen.
BTW - The guy who runs this Site Voted for Romney as well in the General Election, as hesitantly as others here did, try breaking his balls for a while pal.
You and I are officially over.
Romney lost because he did not run against Obama. Calling him a good guy is not running against him. And yes, I know that he knows how to run, he did a job on conservatives every single chance he got. He doesn’t run against liberals. So Obama got a pass. He was required to run against Obama. He had to give people a reason to vote for him by contrasting himself with Obama. Either he could not make the contrast because he is too much like Obama or he would not make the contrast because he liked Obama too much. In any event, he never pressed his case.
The next problem with your blustery thesis is that I’m not a guy, your Bud or a pal. Third, the problem you continue to refuse to address is the fact the the liberals are attempting to manipulating conservatives in the republican party the way democrats manipulate their low info voters. A liberal is a liberal whether they have a (d) or an (r) next to their names. Conservatives do not support communists, liberals, socialists, marxists, or their ideas, period. A good GOPe-trained, low-info republican will support marxism, communism, socialism and liberalism if they are corralled into doing so.
You get your “balls broken” (figuratively) because you don’t see that the GOPe has manipulated you into voting the way you did and you are blindly defending your choice of voting for a socialist by trying to deflect your guilt on to those who could not of good conscience and principle allow themselves to be manipulated. I’ll put it in the vernacular you will better understand. You are trying to “break the balls” of people who refuse to vote for socialists, liberals, communists and marxists with (r) next to their names. That is why I responded to your original post. I responded to others as well.
So don’t consider yourself special. You’re not special with me, confused but not special. I don’t have any vendetta against you. You are just one of the sleeping, uninformed blind who needs a wake up call. Until conservatives wake up those who have been duped into thinking there are two workable political parties, there will be no improvement in this country.
Who Jim Robinson or anyone else on this site voted for is not my concern. But anyone who tries to make a case for that POS, gay agenda loving, baby killing, lying, socialist Romney will always have a problem with me. At least Jim Robinson seems to understand that there are people of conscience, principles and conviction who will never vote for socialists like Romney, even if they have an (r) next to their name. You don’t seem to understand that at all.
And the next time you decide to invoke Mr. Robinson’s name as cover for your ridiculous rants, you should ping him.