To: afraidfortherepublic
Well then I expect you two to throw your hats into the ring for President and VP next cycle. Why do you have such a stupid expectation? Because you are angry that we're correct and are calling you out on your own laziness to do your own due diligence?
118 posted on
09/05/2013 11:29:19 AM PDT by
Finny
(Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
To: Finny; afraidfortherepublic
Why do you have such a stupid expectation? Because you are angry that we're correct and are calling you out on your own laziness to do your own due diligence?
Bingo!
Which means, afraidfortherepublic, that you have neither a teachable heart, or the desire to learn, or the desire for an honest debate on these issues because you REFUSE to admit when you are wrong when confronted with historical evidence that refutes your position.
Which really puts the question whether or not you really are a conservative into play!
124 posted on
09/05/2013 11:35:14 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Finny
No, because Jesus once told an angry crowd, “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.”
Same advice for you. If you don’t like our candidates, run yourself and let us judge your credentials.
People say many things during the course of a campaign. People also change their opinions over the years. It is up to us to discern their statements. I would give a candidate who is 85% of what I want the benefit of the doubt over one who is only 5% of what I want (breathing and on the golf course). There is just no comparison.
Did you work for Santorum, if you didn’t like Romney? Who was your candidate?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson