Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf; advertising guy

posted this earlier on another thread:

Remember the insistence/drum beat that there will be “no boots on the ground”? I can’t find the link but I have already seen an Obama plan that would send special forces into Syria to secure chemical weapons! Insane!


117 posted on 09/03/2013 12:34:34 PM PDT by thouworm (A lawless oligarchy has replaced our Constitution-based govt. Their motto: Catch us if you can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: thouworm

So, they will go in to secure Saddam’s... OOPS.. I mean, Assad’’s Chemical Weapons?


119 posted on 09/03/2013 12:36:09 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: thouworm

Kerry responding to Corker: “No boots on ground with respect to the civil war” but didn’t rule out that we won’t have troops there.


133 posted on 09/03/2013 12:46:10 PM PDT by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: thouworm; advertising guy; maggief; tcrlaf; rainee

Kerry (re: boots on the ground-— IN ONE BREATH):

“It would be preferable not to not because the the the there’s any intention or any plan or any desire whatsoever to have boots on the ground. I think the Pres would give you every assurance in the world as am I as as the Sec of Defense and the Chairman,

“BUT in the event that Syria imploded or in the event that their was a a a chemical weapons cache falling into the hands of a Al Nusrah or someone else and it was clearly in the interests of out allies or all of us-—the British, the French, or others-—to prevent those WMD from falling into the hands of the worst elements, I don’t want to take OFF the table an option that might or might not be available to the Pres of the US to secure OUR COUNTRY.

“So, that was the ONLY kind of example, the ONLY thing I can think of that would immediately leap to mind to say, you know...

Mendendez interrupts: “Well if we said that there would be no troops on the ground for combat purposes...

KERRY: Well, assuming that in the going to protect those weapons, whether or not they had to answer a shot in order to be secure, I don’t want to speak that. Bottom line is this. Can I give you the bottom line?

I am absolutely confident that it is easy, not that complicated, to work out language that will satisfy the Congress and the American people that there is no door open here through which someone can march in ways the Congress doesn’t want it to while still protecting the national security interests of the country....

The bottom line is the Pres has no intention and will not and we do not want to put American troops on the ground to fight this or be involved in the fighting of this civil war.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BS: We are certain the rebels ALREADY have chem weapons! Boots WILL be on the ground!


150 posted on 09/03/2013 12:54:55 PM PDT by thouworm (A lawless oligarchy has replaced our Constitution-based govt. Their motto: Catch us if you can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson