Yes he did, he and John Effing Kerry should have been tried for treason.
He was a reporter offering an opinion.
That's not the job of a reporter, it's the job of a news analyst. He was just a RATagandist, stirring up the domestic communists, SDS and other Disestablishmentarianist hippies.
We have freedom of the press and that is a very good thing.
NO WE DON'T!
Not since the likes of Cronkite and his wannabe Dan Rather. If you want news, you either have to go the a foreign news source, or the new media. The dinosaur press is free press has no positive value to the American people. It's blatant leftist agenda driven propaganda.
Also, he was right.
No he wasn't, we never lost a battle in Viet Nam. Except John Kerry was up in front of Congress lying his @$$ off, throwing someone else's medals over the White House fence, and over in Paris illegally negotiating with the Viet Cong.
The dinosaur press is not a free press, it has no positive value to the American people.
“No he wasn’t, we never lost a battle in Viet Nam. Except John Kerry was up in front of Congress lying his @$$ off, throwing someone else’s medals over the White House fence, and over in Paris illegally negotiating with the Viet Cong”.
While the other traitor was in Moscow marching in the streets protesting against his own country in a time of war. Both Clinton and Kerry should have been charged with treason against the United States.
We disagree on most of these points but especially on how the war was being fought. If you believe the American military was all in to win you are sadly mistaken. It wasn’t their fault, though. It was the fault of those in charge of the military. They did not have the balls to go all in.
Unless you believe it was easier to win WWII then win in Vietnam.