Replies

I know to many patriot Americans, Comrade Kerry, who was anti-Vietnam War in the 60s and 70s, is guilty of being a hypocrite, but what you reason and fact based folks don’t understand is that Kerry is a Progressive (Communist) - thus in the days of the Vietnam War the Internationalist Duty was to stand with the Communist Party of Vietnam in Hanoi against the United States.

However, today when a Progressive (Communist) is PUSA and you are his Secretary of State, one’s clear Internationalist Duty is to be FOR THE WAR!

I hope I cleared up this misunderstanding :-)

perfectly

I know to many patriot Americans, Comrade Kerry, who was anti-Vietnam War in the 60s and 70s, is guilty of being a hypocrite, but what you reason and fact based folks don’t understand is that Kerry is a Progressive (Communist) - thus in the days of the Vietnam War the Internationalist Duty was to stand with the Communist Party of Vietnam in Hanoi against the United States.

However, today when a Progressive (Communist) is PUSA and you are his Secretary of State, one’s clear Internationalist Duty is to be FOR THE WAR!

I hope I cleared up this misunderstanding :-)

If you read the Archives closely (and at mind-numbing length) you will find these strange moments of conflict, when a more recently launched operation obviated an earlier, ongoing op in such way that, for instance, one directorate S illegal actually “eliminated” another agent on his own side.

Thus today we see Comrade Kerry and Comrade Putin, still Great Believers, acting in opposition to one another as their particular op dictates.

You can’t help but wonder which will end up Stalin and which Trotsky.