Posted on 08/31/2013 9:57:44 PM PDT by Errant
President Obama will carry out military action against Syria even if Congress votes against it, a senior State Department official tells Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen.
Rosens notes concerning the White Houses reported intentions regarding the Syrian crisis were posted on Fox News colleague Greta Van Susterens Gretawire site late Saturday afternoon.
Rosen reports that the presidents decision to seek a congressional debate and vote was a surprise to most if not all of his national security team members. The state department official who communicated with Rosen added that Obamas move to seek congressional approval did not supplant the presidents earlier decision to use force in Syria, only delayed its implementation.
Thats going to happen, anyway, the source told Rosen, which is why Obamas Rose Garden remarks Saturday included his belief that he possesses the authority to launch strikes even without congressional authorization, Rosen adds.
The White House Saturday sent Congress a draft of a resolution authorizing Obama to use military force against Syria and laying out the administrations claim that Assads regime killed more than 1,000 last week in a chemical weapons attack.
The resolution also says the objective of a U.S. military response would be to deter, disrupt, prevent and degrade the regimes ability to use chemical weapons going forward.
The resolution authorizes Obama to use the military as he determines necessary and appropriate to serve that goal. The draft doesnt lay out a timeline for action but does say only a political settlement can resolve the Syrian crisis.
The AntiChrist has to do what he has to do to jumpstart the Apocalypse...
“Lawless One” sure fits him.
Just doesn't make sense that Assad would use gas when he's beaten back the Rebels. They on the other hand, have plenty of incentive.
He’s done so many things already that warrant impeachment but it hasn’t happened. I can’t believe it ever will.
If for no other reason, there are too many powerful people in the shadows telling him what to do. Another reason is those powers, through the NSA, has way too much dirt on way too many politicians and judges.
The unknown is Israel's need to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons. That's also a common goal for Saudi Arabia and the US; hence Obama make take action even without Congress agreeing.
I look for another "incident" to occur in the near future which gives Obama even more reason to attack Syria.
Impeach Obama....NOW!!! Defund Obamacare.....NOW!!!
(www.dontfundobamacare.com or www.dontfundit.com)
Reasons:
- No jobs
- No economic growth
- Obamacare
- Race hatred (Black racist)!!!
- Anti-American....Loves/Adores the Muslim Brotherhood!!!
- Debt Crisis
- Failed world & country (USA) leader
- Would be Dictator/Tyrant
- No leadership qualities whatsoever!!!
- Divider...not a Uniter!!!
- Seeking to bring the USA down!!!
- Closet Muslim
- Failed Arab Spring!!!
- Murder in Benghazi!!!
- IRS made political & criminal
- Nations Defense gutted!!!
- NSA privacy violations
- Justice Department used for political purposes
Defund Obamacare.....www.dontfundobamacare, www.donfundit.com!!!
Congress Critters, Senate/House....Deny Obama approval to attack Syria!!!
Instead....Impeach him!!!
Coffee is for closers.
Between the subs you mentioned and putting Russian pilots in Syrian migs armed with anti ship missles, could send a few thousand of our navy into the drink. Hope he doesnt do it, but if I was him, I would. Either that, or put the russian military advisers at all his airfields and get Putin to get obama to flinch again.
“I dont think Boner has the bbs. It may pass the Senate, but doubtful it will pass the House regardless of what Boner has told 0bama”
There’s not much Boehner can do about this.
If all the democrats vote for the war, Obama only needs 17 neocon republicans to flip and he’ll get his war.
Not plausible unless Obama’s real strategy is to effectively disband Congress by showing even to low information voters that it is no longer needed to govern. It is more likely that the GOP will vote for war and Obama will get his bipartisan support and shared blame for the attack.
Agree...what better day to start WWIII than 9/11/13?
This appears to be a stalling tactic to give Assad more time to disperse his military assets, making it more unlikely that any puny attack by Obama will have an affect.
Why even waste dwindling defense funds on this worthless attempt to salvage Obama’s lousy global reputation?
The chickens are coming home to roost. Total incompetence all the way around. No surprises, no big deal. Putin, Assad, Nasrallah (Hizbollah) all playing Obama for a fool, which he has proven to be. Even the stammerer, Roman emperor Claudius ONLY played the fool. This President, for all his cool demeanor and pop-star qualities, is proving to be what we already knew in 2008 - a stuffed shirt.
Bottom line: what will the US do when Iran is about to go nuclear? More red lines? More threats? More consultations and debates? Or are we just going to let Uran become a ten-fold N. Korea? The what?
This whole Syrian thing is really about Iran and so far, it looks like they are going to get their bomb unless the world FORCES tiny Israel, with its back to the wall, to try to take down Iran...alone. Very sad folks.
Don’t doubt it, Obozo is already bought by the Saudi’s. He can only do what his masters tell him.
Is action without Congress unconstitutional? Yes. Except if we are attacked or threatened. Neither of which fits this.
What will Congress do? That is a good question. If congress finds grounds and brings impeachment against Obozo (or whatever his real name is) the Senate will not remove him. He knows that.
Checkmate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.