Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Constitution 123; xzins; Jim Robinson

Ronald Reagan’s 1980 successful campaign for presidency began in earnest in 1974. It took 6 years of dedication and hard work by basically grass roots people to get him past the GOP roadblocks and to secure the nomination and the presidency.

We have about 3 years to do what it took Ronald Reagan to do in 6 years. Either we all gather under one banner or we will be scattered abroad.

It is long past time where we need to choose our Ronald Reagan for 2016. If it isn’t going to be Ted Cruz, then we’d better find somebody in a hurry. Ted is the smartest guy in Washington. He is everything we could ask for in his political viewpoint and he will destroy any liberal candidate in a one on one debate. He has not cowered before the MSM and he has managed to avoid being destroyed by the slanders of the MSM.

I don’t see anyone else on the horizon that is even in the same league with Cruz on enunciating conservative principles confidently and powerfully.

He, in many ways is the reflection of our founders.

I am glad we are one the same page. Clearly now is not the time to quibble over some esoteric interpretation of an archaic expression in the Founding document when the principles of that founding document are under daily assault.

Maybe Ted Cruz is not the right guy for this time. Maybe I’m wrong about his leadership qualities and maybe there is someone out there who is more equipped to lead us into the future. Maybe, but we don’t have a lot of time to find him or her. Early voting starts 3 years from today. We are already three years behind the curve.

If anyone thinks Ted Cruz is not the man for the Job, then tell us who is and why he or she is better equipped for that job.

I don’t want to hear the excuse “Ted Cruz would make a great president, but....” No buts. Either we find our Reagan now or we can look towards a Future under Tyranny.


524 posted on 09/01/2013 8:21:01 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe
If anyone thinks Ted Cruz is not the man for the Job, then tell us who is and why he or she is better equipped for that job.

You've hit the nail right on the head.

I don't see anyone out there who can match Cruz's intelligence, education and background.

I can't seen anyone out there who can and will advocate conservative values and principles as articulately as Ted Cruz.

And, perhaps most importantly, I don't see anyone out there who is less intimidated by the MSM and by the interest groups who demand surrender or unnecessary compromise.

Ted Cruz is very special. I don't know of an adequate substitute. And, no, I don't work for Ted Cruz. ;-)

Ted Cruz - 2016

529 posted on 09/01/2013 8:30:59 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
"If anyone thinks Ted Cruz is not the man for the Job, then tell us who is and why he or she is better equipped for that job."

I'm looking for a America first conservative. I hope it is Cruz but if he is not for ending our loss of blood and treasure as world policeman plus restoring made in America, I'll keep looking.

530 posted on 09/01/2013 8:31:51 AM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
""""Clearly now is not the time to quibble over some esoteric interpretation of an archaic expression in the Founding document when the principles of that founding document are under daily assault.""""

Well said / bears repeating

532 posted on 09/01/2013 8:32:37 AM PDT by Constitution 123 (Knowledge is power but to Obots,ignorance is bliss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson