There is a Constitutional distinction, between “natural-born citizen” and “born citizen,” as evidenced by the language of the Nationality Act of 1790 having been rescinded and replaced with such language as it was, by the Nationality Act of 1795. Original Intent is demonstrated in more ways than one by those Acts, being largely created by Founders as they were, being of that era. The sword cuts both ways, in other words. It shows that birth abroad was not originally intended to preclude eligibility to the Presidency in and of itself, but it also demonstrates that citizenship at birth is not necessarily natural-born citizenship, Constitutionally speaking.
There is a Constitutional distinction, between “natural-born citizen” and “born citizen,” as evidenced by the language of the Nationality Act of 1790 having been rescinded and replaced with such language as it was, by the Nationality Act of 1795. Actually is was the "Naturalization Act of 1790" (and 1795), not Nationality Act".
Original Intent is demonstrated in more ways than one by those Acts, being largely created by Founders as they were, being of that era. The sword cuts both ways, in other words. It shows that birth abroad was not originally intended to preclude eligibility to the Presidency in and of itself,...
It showed more than that. It specifically used the term NBC.
but it also demonstrates that citizenship at birth is not necessarily natural-born citizenship, Constitutionally speaking.
Don't know how you come to that conclusion.