To: Kenny Bunk; P-Marlowe; Sun; Seizethecarp; Jim Robinson; LucyT; null and void
What I think has happened is that with a man of legitimately questionable eligibility having "won" the Presidency, many of us have decided to use it as a precedent to fight our way back to constitutional republican government with an as yet potential candidate whose eligibility is less than clear-cut to those who interpret the Article II my way, or their way, as opposed to those who agree with you. Kenny full of Bunk? Could be. When the SCOTUS says so, I think Cruz will be an unbeatable candidate.
The fact that the potential candidate is strong in our beliefs makes the question more difficult. But, the question remains.
Do you give a damn about the Founders' orginal intent - or is it all about 9 people and bureuacratic technicalities? Oh, wait...you've made that clear. Now go enjoy your lo flow toilets.
336 posted on
08/31/2013 8:48:14 AM PDT by
C. Edmund Wright
(Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
To: C. Edmund Wright; Kenny Bunk
Now go enjoy your lo flow toilets. OMG! ROFLOL
Never has so much been said in so few words!
341 posted on
08/31/2013 9:15:51 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson