Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/30/2013 11:45:46 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

“Finesse”?

Hussein?

Don’t make me laugh.


2 posted on 08/30/2013 11:47:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Fearless leader is a traitor and a war criminal.

Plus he needs to give back his Nobel prize.


3 posted on 08/30/2013 11:48:04 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Bhadrakumar is an anti-American ex-Indian diplomat who’s been toeing the Indian line that Iranian nukes aren’t a bad thing for the last decade. Conveniently for India, breaking international trade sanctions imposed on Iran helps line the pockets of a lot of Indian officials. He obviously thinks Americans are morons who can’t figure out that he’s talking his book. Stuff like this why India will never be an American ally in the way the NATO countries are - with diplomacy, as with trade, finance and just about anything else the Indians touch, naked self-interest trumps everything previously agreed-upon. In their dealings with foreigners, they make the Chinese look like models of rectitude.


6 posted on 08/30/2013 12:01:49 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“Who would say Obama is not a humane and considerate statesman?”

I presume there was heavy sarcasm behind that statement. “Humane and considerate” are not adjectives I would apply, and anybody with a sense of decency is shocked and appalled at any such characterization. People will die if these missile strikes are carried out, the vast majority of them would be non-combatants, and there is no way to distinguish from the view available for the guidance of a cruise missile.

The US was slammed and slandered because of the many Iraqis who died because of the US presence in that country, but in fact, the majority of them died as collateral damage wrought by the retreating Saddam Hussein partisans, and subsequent guerrilla actions before the country was pacified to a tolerable degree.

If we go launching our artillery and missiles into Syria, then, by the same reasoning so gleefully applied by the critics, ALL the casualties in Syria will be due to action of the US military.

More than anybody else, Jean-Francois Kerre` should understand how that logic works, as he has applied it to just about every conflict the US has participated in in the last half-century. And as you know, the current US Secretary of State once served in Viet Nam, so he speaks with first-hand authority. Most generally believes he is right, too. Just ask him.


7 posted on 08/30/2013 12:13:42 PM PDT by alloysteel (Unattended children will be given a Red Bull and a free Kazoo. Reminds me of Congress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
As CNN's military analysts are at pains to explain, this is going to be a military operation that incurs no risk of US casualties.

Are these CNN's military analysts in possession of a signed document from Hassad promising not to retaliate if attacked???

Do these analysts really believe that Syria doesn't have missiles capable of hitting our ships in the Med?

8 posted on 08/30/2013 12:17:54 PM PDT by varon ( cum tyrannis para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson