Did you read Daniel Greenfield’s article about the R party? It’s vital. Explains why the GOP sucks. Why they like amnesty. Why they invariably disappoint, are eunuchs, say nice things to get us to vote and then can never stand up for conservative principles.
Of course there are a few good Rs but they can’t do much since the entire party apparatus and elites are rotten to the core.
And Paul is a liberaltarian at heart so that’s that.
And sadly, Cruz is not a NBC so the dems don’t need to pull out anything nefarious, just some of the research that’s been done on FR proving Zero a non-NBC will do.
Guess who knows the truth about NBC? - TED CRUZ himself, as he should.
And here on FR, SoConPubbie is absolutely correct about the Constitution, the law and the Court NOT defining natural born citizen as having anything to do with being born across a boundary line.
And the controlling law has been cited by FReeper xzins on one of the threads that people with the false view of it have turned into Birther threads. There is firm, unshakable ground to lawfully define NBC as a baby who was defined AT BIRTH as a citizen and not needing later naturalization. Based on either a mother or a father (both not required - read xzins legal citiation) who was clearly an American citizen and met certain age and residency requirements (born across a boundary line NOT controlling, American citizen parent controlling).
It will be happy days when Ted Cruz’s American citizenship at the moment of his birth is VINDICATED as the standing law of the land on the legal meaning of natural born citizenship.
It is vindicated here already thanks to several great FReepers’ work.
But in the end it will shine to the world as brightly as the brightest noonday sun, and will show Ted Cruz knows the truth about his own citizenship, as he should.