The fact that 1790 Naturalization law says that children born abroad to US citizen parents should be considered “as” natural born citizens tells us that legislators at that time did not consider those children to actually be nbCs. Next revision of the Naturalization law in 1795 changed the wording by dropping the word "natural". This is an additional proof that legislators at that time did not consder the two phrases to have the same meaning. We are left with the only nbC definition that makes sense: born in the country of citizen parents.
SCOTUS in Minor confirmed this when discussing Virginia Minor's citizenship.
Obot is a person who lies, obfuscates and misleads others all in an effort to justify Obama's eligibility. A true conservative would never quote Justia.com as a leading legal web site. Not only did you quote them, you continued lying on their behalf, claiming that they did not remove references to Minor from other SCOTUS cases. The evidence of their manipulation is out there. Even Justia did not deny it. They used a lame excuse that an innocent programing error occurred. Those of us, who read their excuse and who are familiar with "Regular Expressions" used in text processing, know that this was a lie to cover up intentional manipulation of SCOTUS texts.
“A true conservative would never quote Justia.com as a leading legal web site. Not only did you quote them, you continued lying on their behalf, claiming that they did not remove references to Minor from other SCOTUS cases.”
Yes, one would. And I did not say Justia didn’t accidentally remove references, but that Minor itself remained and was available. I also pointed out no lawyer, DA or court relies on justia, but instead they use Westlaw and LexisNexis.
“We are left with the only nbC definition that makes sense: born in the country of citizen parents.”
No. WKA went into exhaustive detail on the meaning of NBC. I’m sorry you don’t understand what the US Supreme Court wrote:
“It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established.”