I've already proven that the info in Wong Kim Ark on which that decision was based is FALSE. And REPEATEDLY so, via SEVERAL factual sources.
"Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen."
The Ankeny decision relies on the FALSE INFO in Wong Kim Ark.
“Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President."
That ruling also relies on the FALSE INFO in Wong Kim Ark.
The entirety of Obama's purported "eligibility" court rulings is a house of cards based on the SERIOUSLY flawed Wong Kim Ark ruling. The "natural born subject" info Gray wrote into the Wong Kim Ark ruling is CLEARLY HISTORICALLY FALSE. Easily proven so.
Congratulations on proving yourself right to yourself. Now if you could only interest any trier of fact anywhere in America of the validity of your arguments, we’d have more to talk about. But until then, not so much.
Not one acknowledged expert in constitutional law from an originalist, textualist or strict constructionist legal philosophy has gone near the natural born citizenship issue.