[Mr Rogers]

A state court ruling cited with approval by the US Supreme Court.

You can try quoting rulings used in the DISSENT of the WKA decision, but by definition, the DISSENT is written by the side that LOSES. Those rulings were contrary to the conclusion of Lynch v Clarke, and were REJECTED by the US Supreme Court. Rejected. That means that side (yours) lost. In 1898. Deal with it.

[Rides3]

Why would the Supreme Court cite a state court ruling that was subsequently quickly negated by federal law? Which Supreme Court decision cited it? There's yet another indication that serious errors of fact are committed by whoever is writing Supreme Court decisions.

And I never quoted any dissenting WKA opinions. I'm merely citing actual historical facts.