Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mulder1
Not so fast:

AP sources: Intelligence on weapons no 'slam dunk'

373 posted on 08/29/2013 4:19:40 AM PDT by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]


To: quimby; mulder1

• Despite Obama’s comments, the intelligence linking President Assad or his inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack that killed at least 100 people is no “slam dunk,” with questions remaining about who actually controls some of Syria’s chemical weapons stores and doubts about whether Assad himself ordered the strike, US intelligence officials have told AP. Multiple US officials used the phrase “not a slam dunk” to describe the intelligence picture — a reference to then-CIA Director George Tenet’s insistence in 2002 that US intelligence showing Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was a “slam dunk” — intelligence that turned out to be wrong.

• Allied air strikes against the Syrian government over the alleged use of chemical weapons could be delayed until next week in the face of strong opposition in the UK parliament to British involvement in immediate military action. The prime minister, David Cameron, conceded that MPs would be given a second vote to approve military action to defuse a parliamentary revolt, ahead of a Commons debate on Syria today. Whitehall sources indicated that the US, which had planned to launch the strikes by the weekend, is prepared to revive a back-up plan to delay the strikes until Tuesday when Barack Obama is due to set out for the G20 summit in Russia.


374 posted on 08/29/2013 4:27:42 AM PDT by MestaMachine (My caps work, You gotta earn them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

To: quimby; All

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/29/world/middleeast/us-facing-test-on-data-to-back-action-on-syria.html

American officials said Wednesday there was no “smoking gun” that directly links President Bashar al-Assad to the attack, and they tried to lower expectations about the public intelligence presentation. They said it will not contain specific electronic intercepts of communications between Syrian commanders or detailed reporting from spies and sources on the ground.

#

Shocking. /sarc.

REUTERS:

Britain says it would be legally entitled to take military action against Syria even if the U.N. Security Council blocked such action.


377 posted on 08/29/2013 4:54:53 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson