Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BreezyDog; babble-on
Personally, I believe that the investigative reporting from either NewsMax or WND has a more credible history than most of the mainstream media. The disappointment that I have felt on most occasions is because what they find is ignored and not disproved in most cases. Have they been the target of sources who have intentionally misled them on occasion? They are leaders not followers when it comes to reporting so this is always a risk. You are more than welcome to cite examples if you wish.

What WND and NewsMax are attacked for the most however are not stories where they have been intentionally misled, but stories which ultimately prove to be absolutely and completely true. And in these cases I find it very annoying to have people who claim to be conservatives parroting the diversionary lies of those protecting Obama or the interests of the far left.

55 posted on 08/27/2013 11:10:17 AM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: fireman15

Like I said...I don’t not believe them. They are very impotent when comes to getting the story out there. They need to throw a tantrum every once in a while...bad marketing perhaps?


57 posted on 08/27/2013 7:15:31 PM PDT by BreezyDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson