To: Rides3
When I concluded in post 300 That Natural Born Citizen means, a person born of citizen parents both mother and father loyal only to the USA. That was a contextual conclusion based the logic of the framers.
You stated my conclusion, said I was wrong while ignoring all the logic I used in that post. You compose your post like a clever attorney.
So I encourage people here to read my post # 300, then your reply and decide if they agree with my thinking or yours.
311 posted on
08/28/2013 9:20:04 AM PDT by
Constitution 123
(Knowledge is power but to some, ignorance is bliss.)
To: Constitution 123
The last reply was ment for David.... My Bad
312 posted on
08/28/2013 9:24:26 AM PDT by
Constitution 123
(Knowledge is power but to to Obots, ignorance is bliss.)
To: Constitution 123
I didn’t say you were wrong. I agree that Cruz and Obama are ineligible. Read my posts.
You must have me confused with someone else.
319 posted on
08/28/2013 1:41:29 PM PDT by
Rides3
To: Constitution 123
When I concluded in post 300 That Natural Born Citizen means, a person born of citizen parents both mother and father loyal only to the USA. That was a contextual conclusion based the logic of the framers.
Yes. Unfortunately, it's counter to what the Founders actually wrote into the Constitution, and also counter to at least what one prominent Founder, James Madison (who knew a thing or two about our greatest document) believed.
Guesses and extrapolations about intent can never trump their actual clear words.
321 posted on
08/30/2013 4:07:57 AM PDT by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson