To: Constitution 123
We, who to have followed this issue since 2008 all know the arguments..... You, asking posters to repeat these arguments is a waste of time.... just review all the posts here since Obummer ran the first time. and educate yourself instead of asking stupid questions.
So I take it you can not prove your position by relevant US Law, the US Constitution, or Supreme Court Ruling.
In effect, you are stating your opinion concerning what is constitutional, not what is legally considered constitution as of right now by US Law.
177 posted on
08/26/2013 6:32:14 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie; Constitution 123
In effect, you are stating your opinion concerning what is constitutional, not what is legally considered constitution as of right now by US Law.
Should have been:
In effect, you are stating your opinion concerning what is constitutional, not what is legally considered constitutional as of right now by US Law.
178 posted on
08/26/2013 6:33:35 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson