Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
Strengthen the requirement - don't weaken it!

I agree.

My point is that those believing there is no difference should use the constitutional procedure to resolve it.

Until then, neither Cruz nor Soetoro/Obama are qualified.

107 posted on 08/26/2013 4:13:03 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: brityank; Windflier
My point is that those believing there is no difference should use the constitutional procedure to resolve it.

Until then, neither Cruz nor Soetoro/Obama are qualified.
Sorry my FRiend, but you have it exactly backwards as to what is constitutionally correct.

Your definition does not pass constitutional muster today AS THE LAW IS WRITTEN TODAY.

There IS NOT DEFINITION in the Constitution or in current US Law that requires both parents to be US Citizens at birth.

That is the point being made on this thread.

If you, and the other birthers want the requirement to be stated exactly as you believe IT WAS INTENDED, you, and those who believe as you do, will have to shepherd this through the process that is defined in the Constitution to amend the Constitution.
126 posted on 08/26/2013 4:33:22 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson