This is high stakes lying by this WH and if they are in on it....it will spell the end of Obama and the entire democrat party.
Right on cue ...
Syria strategy can’t rely solely on military might
EXCERPT
But the fact that Syria offers no perfect outcomes or options does not mean that all possible outcomes are equally undesirable. It remains in the United States’ interest now as two years ago to see more moderate forces prevail. This can’t be achieved with one or two volleys of cruise missiles. It will require patience and commitment.
The United States can’t dictate the outcome in Syria, and it would be foolish to send ground troops in an effort to do so. But by combining military measures with training, weapons supplies and diplomacy, it could exercise considerable influence. The military measures could include destroying forces involved in chemical weapons use and elements of the Syrian air force that have been used to target civilians, as well as helping to carve out a safe zone for rebels and the civilian populations they are seeking to protect.
Such military action should be seen as one component of a policy that finally recognizes a U.S. interest in helping to shape Syria’s future.
“This is high stakes lying by this WH and if they are in on it....it will spell the end of Obama and the entire democrat party.”
I don’t see how that will ever be proved.
McCain has on his full-dress warpaint. Kerry is positively glowing with his own “importance.”
The ground is pulsing with the war drumbeat.
The die is cast. It doesn’t matter WHO used the chems or where they came from, the “int’l community” realizes this is the opportunity to go get them and bury all of those pesky questions.
Meanwhile, what does Iran have to do to get attention?