Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Netz
I see your point. So you’re saying it’s not in Putin’s (and therefore not in Syrian or Hizbollah’s) interest to involve Israel at this point?

Exactly, at least regarding Russia, Syria and Iran.

Syria, Hizbollah, Iran, HAMAS do nothing is response?

I'm not saying that at all. There are plenty of options, especially for Syria and Iran, that do not involve Israel. HAMAS or Hezbollah might hit Israel, but I suspect Hezbollah is pretty well tied up assisting Assad presently anyway.

There's no need to exclude Russia, though. If we hit Assad hard enough, Putin could, as others have suggested, respond by sinking a British ship in the area. THEN what do we do?

165 posted on 08/26/2013 1:49:35 AM PDT by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Paul R.
I do not think Obama will hit Syria “hard”, that is the crux of this entire operation. He, the President, has to be seen “punishing” the Assad regime but not too much.
He is the author of “Soft power” isn't he?

Therefore, I throw out the proposition that Obama launches 37 Tomahawks, lots of empty buildings hit, maybe the Ministry of Defense (empty at 03:00) and a Republican Guard base, no more than that.

He quickly announces that it's all over and let that be a lesson to you Assad...

Putin would sink a British warship? I do not see it as it would require an escalation, something nobody wants.

168 posted on 08/26/2013 2:07:31 AM PDT by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson