Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

if he wanted to sue...he would win!

oh wait Detroit has no money to pay ANY sort of settlement..

what to do what to do


2 posted on 08/25/2013 7:53:54 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team / al-Kilab Division)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MeshugeMikey

He doesn’t have to sue Detroit. He sues the ad agency and graphic artist who stole the image. Image theft is rampant and should be stopped, just like the theft of any other property. Lawsuits are a good way to let it be known that no, you just can’t swipe a copyrighted image and make a profit from it anymore than you can publish someone else’s book under your own name and collect money for it.


5 posted on 08/25/2013 7:57:30 AM PDT by ottbmare (the OTTB mare, now a proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

This seems like a non-issue.

Evidently “his” photo was used in the mock-up ahead of time.

None of his work was used actual production.

See the article, about paragraph 5.


7 posted on 08/25/2013 7:58:29 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

I have to spend 1000’s to protect my trademarks and am never compensated. This new America is filled with thieves and liars and a handshake means nothing anymore.


8 posted on 08/25/2013 7:58:41 AM PDT by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

“Alcott later conceded the image on the cars was not his — they were only on the photo on the mock-up that was displayed before the cars went public.”

Never mind...


10 posted on 08/25/2013 8:00:21 AM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey
if he wanted to sue...he would win!

Actually he doesn't have much of a case. He admits that the photo used on the produced cars isn't his. The photo he claims is his was used on mock ups.

He should take them to small claims court and get his $1500 and go away.
17 posted on 08/25/2013 8:07:42 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MeshugeMikey

All the city has to do is to get a pet judge to rule that the city skyline is an intrinsic property of the city and that the city itself owns the copyright to that skyline.


34 posted on 08/25/2013 8:26:36 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson