Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Ok, then they should just do a REALLY crappy job (blurry, out of focus images, etc), and charge them up the wazoo.


40 posted on 08/25/2013 8:39:55 AM PDT by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mkleesma

“Ok, then they should just do a REALLY crappy job (blurry, out of focus images, etc), and charge them up the wazoo.”

Nah, the fags would be back in court faster than you can say “dildoe.” This needs to go to the SCOTUS. If they fail to honor the Constitution ( which sadly is a distinct possibility now that we have three Marxist women on the court) then it will be time enough for “independent business actions.”


54 posted on 08/25/2013 9:09:40 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: mkleesma
Ok, then they should just do a REALLY crappy job (blurry, out of focus images, etc), and charge them up the wazoo.

If I were a photographer, I would far rather refuse outright to photograph a gay "wedding" than deliberately botch the job. Those pictures might get around and affect my legitimate wedding photo business.

I'd just keep the gay stuff out of my professional portfolio, and for any wedding-related clientele, make sure that any of my pieces of paper that are delivered to the customer (invoices, envelopes, folders, etc.) have colourful photos of blatant acts of heterosexual love, and possibly Matthew 19:4-5, printed all over it. Chew it, deviants.

86 posted on 08/25/2013 3:14:57 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson