I’d stop advertizing and just pick up work by word of mouth. If anybody asks, its just a hobby.
Fine.
They could always just take completely crappy pictures.
“Here you go, fags. Here are your out of focus poorly composed pictures. Enjoy your AIDS.”
So, as a private business, I have to accept all paying customers? What if someone wanted me to shoot a video of their honeymoon night in their hotel room? Would I have the right to refuse? Where does it stop?
The judges ignore the rights of Christians to practice their faith as guaranteed by the Constitution.
I think we delude ourselves if we believe that the churches themselves will not be sued over refusal of same sex weddings.
I’d go out of business.....not photographing any biological abberations.
As I suggested on the other thread on this topic....
perhaps we can get the Westboro..”baptist church” to try to hire a “gay couple.’...for some reason or another and wee what transpires ??
Close up shop, and move to another state.
So, have photographers turned down jobs for other reasons or are they always required to always take the job form any person walking through the door with a check that doesn’t bounce?
ummmm... isn't this a PRIVATE business?
And what morons would want to FORCE someone to work for them? I would not expect the best work.
just say you can’t fit it in to your schedule.....
this is just another example of forcing ppl to engage in a business transaction that they otherwise don’t want. Theres no free association
Yeah right. Fuc# you! I have a cold.
I have a right to refuse service to anyone.
Especially fags, judges, ANYBODY that works for the government, liberals, Marxists, baby killers, journalists, lame stream media, anti gun groups, PETA, greenies, global warming idiots, muslims, ILLEGALS, druggies, Hollywood, tree huggers, anybody that drives a Prius, the AARP, Progressive Insurance, etc,etc,etc...
make them a huge bid and they will pick someone else
there are ways
Even by the standards of the liberals who back our federal behemoth, this is a shockingly evil decision. I would hope that the evil lesbians who demanded that these photographers violate their religious beliefs will be shunned by decent people forever. I hope that the lawyers who prosecuted this case in order to violate the First Amendment rights of American citizens will be shunned both personally and in business by decent people forever. Similarly, in this ongoing battle between good and evil, everyone who sides with evil (and enslaving these photographers is inherently evil) will be shunned personally and professionally for life.
What is with these homos, they want to force people to take pictures? I’d take the pictures, with latex gloves and a mask on. I’d be damned if I bothered focusing. It doesn’t make sense to force a vendor to sell services when they don’t want to. Are the homos that stupid?
“Hello, Smith Photography. What’s that? Your wedding was today? But I had it in my schedule book for NEXT Saturday. So sorry. I’ll be glad to refund your deposit. Thank you for choosing Smith Photography.”
They should include a statement that they don’t support gay marriage on each photo.