To: vette6387
“Yes, I agree, I would not tolerate being accosted on the street for a pat down,”
Of course that’s not what was going on in NYC...the renaming is just agitprop.
25 posted on
08/24/2013 6:57:37 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton; vette6387
Yes, I agree, I would not tolerate being accosted on the street for a pat down,
Of course thats not what was going on in NYC...the renaming is just agitprop.
That's exactly what we're talking about here - a policy in which innocent people are stopped on the street by the police and searched. The fact that only around 12% of these stops resulted in the cops finding anything at all tells us how abhorrent the practice is, not to mention how ineffectual.
Read that again - 88% of the people being stopped are innocent victims of an out-of-control police state. They walk away from their "encounter" without an arrest or summons, and likely without any respect for the police.
This isn't a 2nd Amendment question so much as it is a 4th Amendment one. In our country, we do not let the government presume us all criminals until we prove otherwise.
38 posted on
08/25/2013 1:20:50 AM PDT by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson