Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/24/2013 4:50:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
No arguments here. I lost a lawnmower this past year to E10 (unlabeled at the pump the day I filled the 5 gallon can.)

How "environmentally conscious" was the waste of a small engine and the attachments which enabled me to cut grass with it?

When I run 91 octane (real) gasoline, I get 18 MPG. The best I get with 87 octane 10% ethanol is 15 MPG.

I will use the real deal until I no longer can. Then I will pull that engine and put in something different, but I won't buy a new spy vehicle to record and report my activities.

2 posted on 08/24/2013 4:56:58 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Ethanol-free gasoline stations.
http://pure-gas.org/


3 posted on 08/24/2013 5:01:47 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m experimenting with pure (100%) gasoline. My last 2 fillups are with 87 octane regular 100% gasoline, and I’m tracking my mileage after each fillup. I calculate it manually (miles driven / gallons) rather than rely on the dashboard gauge which is not quite as accurate.

I’m going to watch it over a few fillups, then compare to my mileage that I’ve been getting using 91 octane “normal” gas (up to 10% alcohol). I suspect that the higher BTU rate of the pure gasoline will at least equal the mileage enhancement that comes with my engine’s adjustment to the higher octane of the 91 I’ve been using (my engine computer does take advantage of higher octane by adjusting the mixture/timing for the slightly slower burn speed of higher octane fuel).

BTW, I always treat my lawn mower gas with Sta-Bil to help keep it fresh and to help deal with some of the negative effects that alcohol can have on the fuel system of some small engines. Haven’t had any problems with my mower, tractor, or weed-eater.


5 posted on 08/24/2013 5:05:22 AM PDT by meyer (What would John Hancock do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It seems unethical to use food for fuel when children are starving all over the world!

Liberals just want children to die.

9 posted on 08/24/2013 5:17:00 AM PDT by TexasCajun (Creepy-Ass Cracka -- Don't Call Me Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m all for removing the corn ethanol subsidy. Those plants with paid-down capital structures will be fine and only take it because it’s offered. But his argument about food prices in 2012 is specious. The cost of corn in human foods is so small as to be negligible and when you buy a nice juicy ear of corn on the cob, you do realize it’s not the same thing that cows eat, right? Consumers have suffered FAR more significant cost increases in the amount we’ve had to pay for PETRO FUELS (gasoline) which is not due to supply and demand or gov’t subsidies whatsoever.

Compare the price of gas at the pump when GWB left office and today and everyone will quit whining about corn subsidies instantly.


10 posted on 08/24/2013 5:17:32 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; Smokin' Joe

Unfortunately there’s no ethonol-free gasoline station close to us.


13 posted on 08/24/2013 5:32:19 AM PDT by TurkeyLurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson