To: ontap; DManA
Choosing not to serve someone based solely on their God given skin color is repugnant.
Choosing not to serve someone based on their abnormal, harmful lifestyle choice is entirely another matter; especially when it directly collides with one’s religious beliefs.
76 posted on
08/23/2013 7:54:15 AM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Just wanted to say I hope you great NSA folks are enjoying my posts here.)
To: HereInTheHeartland
I think it’s repugnant but my opinion is irrelevant. We delegated the right to decide what’s right and wrong to the Federal Government.
79 posted on
08/23/2013 8:01:50 AM PDT by
DManA
To: HereInTheHeartland
Choosing not to serve someone based solely on their God given skin color is repugnant. Choosing not to serve someone based on their abnormal, harmful lifestyle choice is entirely another matter
Once you gave the government, state or federal, the power to compel the first by force, you cannot complain when it then turns that power to compel the second.
We should have let the free market eliminate the repugnant behavior back then. We didn't, and now we reap the whirlwind.
88 posted on
08/23/2013 9:30:18 AM PDT by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson