Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: buwaya

Software can be programmed to provide a ne’er-do-well programmer backdoor access to a system. As someone experienced in IT security, I can tell you that we often default to hardware security for a reason. Hardware has to pass through numerous tests for hardening and security. If major industry players certify a piece of hardware as secure, it’s their very reputation on the line. If there’s a backdoor and it’s discovered, that hardware becomes a liability.

I personally use KeePass and certificates from StartSSL for my personal security, but I can’t understate the importance of a platform security methodology, and that’s the purpose of a TPM.


113 posted on 08/22/2013 10:54:29 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

Major players in software encryption are no less dependent on reputation.

And many are from very major players, such as Intel and Dell. Everybody has been buying up security companies.


117 posted on 08/22/2013 11:04:56 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson