Wrong. You’ve got it exactly backwards. When you pass lawless laws that give “legal” permission to kill babies, all of them, as long as it is done by your rules, on your timetable, you are surrendering the moral, constitutional, and legal argument against abortion, and assuring the continuation of abortion on demand. Enforced by the courts.
What should be done, which hasn’t been done, for forty years, is to simply assert the self-evident personhood of each and every child, and then protect them, equally, as the Constitution explicitly and imperatively requires.
Keep the oath, and tell the judges to take a short walk off a long pier. They don’t legitimately make our laws. And those who make our laws have no legitimate authority to violate the supreme UNALIENABLE right of the individual.
No, its right. You condemn all the future unborn to the fate of the past because you live in a fantasy world where abortions are NOW illegal and have been just because you say so.
A law that bans some abortions doesnt legalize others, except your your fantasy world where they are all already illegal.
The trap you got yourself in is that your assumptions only work if there are no legal abortions now, that there is no problem, that their are no victims right now.
You turn a blind eye to those unborn victims who can be saved because it doesnt fit your fantasy world. YOU condemn them