Not necessarily. The coroner said he found traces of "amphetamine in his system, consistent with possible intake of methamphetamine". That statement is entirely subjective as the coroner did not find methamphetamine specifically.
Amphetamine can come in many forms, many of which are legal and thus do not fall under the same classification as meth which, as we know, is an illegal street drug.
I meant that the insinuation of the statement by the coroner’s office about the family wanting intervention for drug habits, and the traces etc are stated in such a way as to make it seem as though he was a meth head.
I am sure he was not. I’ve seen the real ones.