So...1 + 1 = 3? Got it, Copernicus. Your handle is a less than subtle give-away of your sole intention and mission.
Maybe because this guy was known to be a relapsed addict whose family was trying to get back in rehab. Or do you think it is “improbable” for a relapsed addict to have drugs in their system?
"Known relapse addict"? By whose definition? And how do YOU know Hastings' family details of such intervention?
Hey, take it up with Hasting [the "METH head], he was doing the drugs, not me.
"Traces" is not exactly the same as abuse. I realize this is a gray area of distinction for you.
ME: “You STILL fail to explain why Hastings car blew up as though it’d been hit by tank mortar... “
Tank mortar? What witness said that? Or is that just another part of your delusion?
Nice reading comprehension. What part of "as though" didn't you understand, Mr. 'Official (Fairy-Tale) Report"'? And besides, we've already determined that Hastings car was an inexplicably unusual fireball as was his bullet-ridden vehicle AND cremated body DURING the strange crash. Never mind his inexplicable un-authorized cremation.
For those of us NOT covering the back-side of the "Official" narrative for some odd reason, we know definitively that Hastings' surveillance and obvious hit occurred because of his investigative journalism exposing YOUR overlords.
“Your handle is a less than subtle give-away of your sole intention and mission.”
You have no idea what my handle means. You’ve just assigned it some meaning in your own delusional mind without even bothering to ask me about it. That’s what delusional people do; they see confirmations of their own paranoid fantasies in normal, everyday things.
“”Known relapse addict”? By whose definition?”
His family’s. I suppose you knew Hastings better than them, eh?
“And how do YOU know Hastings’ family details of such intervention?”
It’s in the coroner’s report.
“Hey, take it up with Hasting [the “METH head], he was doing the drugs, not me.”
If you are going to quote me, do not insert comments into my quote that I did not make. That is shady behavior that doesn’t belong on FR.
“Traces” is not exactly the same as abuse. I realize this is a gray area of distinction for you.”
Yes, because there are plenty of relapsed addicts who use amphetamines responsibly, right? If you knew anything about tox screenings, you would know that all they ever find are traces, even if you are a raging addict. Traces are what the tests are designed to find, genius.
“Nice reading comprehension. What part of “as though” didn’t you understand”
So you admit, the “like a tank mortar” description was just your own personal insinuation, and that no actual witness described the event in those terms?
“And besides, we’ve already determined that Hastings car was an inexplicably unusual fireball as was his bullet-ridden vehicle AND cremated body DURING the strange crash.”
Don’t say “we” like I am included in your delusions, buddy. I remember you and some other wackos deciding, based on visual inspection of one photo, that you thought there were bullet holes in the car. That doesn’t make a “bullet-ridden vehicle” into a reality. And the vehicle fire wasn’t inexplicable, except in your own deluded fantasy.
“we know definitively that Hastings’ surveillance and obvious hit occurred because of his investigative journalism exposing YOUR overlords.”
Oh really, you KNOW this? Then you can point me to a witness that confirms that the feds were actually questioning people Hastings knew, as Hastings claims? Should be simple enough, since you KNOW that it is true, right?