Replies

Please steal and propagate away.

It is time that we teach ourselves and our children about our country’s foundations. And why and how they came to be.

This ongoing argument about the ‘term’ that is that not really a term but just three simple words made up of 2 adjectives and on proper noun is simply insane at this point.

Obama, Cruze, Rubio, Jindal - they do not make the cut. All of them had foreign national father at the time of birth. They are not ‘natural’ Citizens - even if they were ‘born’ citizens.

McCann? At least he had 2 citizen parentS. Unfortunately, the issue of jus soli - which between 1790 and 1795 was not an issue apparently creates the grey area.

Tonight on Hannity Mark Levine was on. He was claiming Cruz was eligible and this all crazy talk - basically pre-labelling anyone challenging Cruz’s eligibility a birther. And coward Hannity was right with him. They are just tools.

They want who they want and the Constitution and its reason and meaning - be damned.

Here it is again:

“Any and all laws passed by Congress that MAKE someone a citizen are a form of naturalization. Congress is ONLY charged with laws for the NATURALIZATION of citizens. So ANY law Congress makes granting citizenship is a form of naturalization. Natural born Citizens are not citizens due to some law made up by Congress. They are - natural.”

Sometimes ignorance is bliss. I will have to examine Levin's amendments carefully, but his blatant dismissal of Thomas Paine, John Bingham, Morrison Waite, James Wilson, Charles Evans Hughes, Dr. David Ramsay, Benjamin Franklin, and we know that Levin has problems with John Marshall, raises many issues. Has he been threatened? He might have simply kept quiet. But his open disdain for founders, framers, and justices, raises questions about his motives on all issues.

Levin's three hour programs are like those paid advertisements for vitamins. He sells his own books, which have done quite well. Because Levin's legal group depends upon Republicans for business, and Republicans are complicit in - the thick of - obfuscation of the abundant documentation of the ‘our common-law and language familiar to the framers’, floating only naturalized citizens to oppose Hillary in 2016, his allegiance is explained as Occam's choice. His clarifications about law are a function of the sources of his income.