Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll
Thank you for taking the time to share your views on this matter. I have summarized my views here.

I can't say you're any more right or wrong than I am because I know that the NBC clause is inherently and incurably uncertain and imprecise. I just suggest that people study the matter, arrive at their own conclusion and vote accordingly. Our electors pick our presidents and these days we pick our electors. And, the Supreme Court is too smart to try to interfere with the process.

So, what we do is important and I want you to do what you think is right.

Thanks, again. ;-)

493 posted on 08/22/2013 10:03:47 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies ]


To: Tau Food

It’s not my opinion.

It’s the law.

I suggest you go to:
http://www.naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Minor v. Happersett (1875) has been used 25 times by subsequent Supreme Courts to determine rulings in other cases. It isn’t dicta or someone’s rambling discourse.

It’s the law, and the Democrats who did this committed treason.


494 posted on 08/22/2013 10:14:36 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITIZEN: BORN IN THE USA OFCITIZEN PARENTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson