Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Constitution 123
When a voter sees a name placed on a ballot, that voter will reasonably assume that candidate has been properly screened and that name belongs there.

Most candidates are eligible. It would be a waste of time to run otherwise. If there are doubts, voters will hear about it and make the decision. And, after they decide, the electors have to decide, also.

I feel very comfortable about the process. It's worked for a long, long time. I'm not worried that Prince Charles is going to come over here and win any elections. ;-)

488 posted on 08/22/2013 2:00:23 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]


To: Tau Food
Restating your distorted position does not make it any more creditable. It is still ridiculous.

No one will ever win an argument with you because you are very stubborn. How-be-it Polite.

Citizens are not constitutional scholars and are not oath-bound to protect and defend the constitution. When a citizen sees a candidates name on an official ballot he will reasonably assume that candidate has been properly screened and that name belongs there.

No need to reply..... just let others read this and decide who is correct..... I am done with you today.... God Bless

489 posted on 08/22/2013 6:47:53 PM PDT by Constitution 123 (some intrest from the legeslature, perhaps then they will heal some appeals brought them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson