Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
I take it you've never seen this before?

Once again, while I have clearly identified - and documented - numerous provably false claims on your part, I can't think offhand of a single statement I've ever made that was untrue. And if there was one or more such statements in the history of 2 years of discussing this crap, I can assure it it, or they, have been quite innocently made, and corrected on my first awareness of any error.

416 posted on 08/20/2013 4:43:38 PM PDT by Jeff Winston (Yeah, I think I could go with Cruz in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston
Once again, while I have clearly identified - and documented - numerous provably false claims on your part, I can't think offhand of a single statement I've ever made that was untrue. And if there was one or more such statements in the history of 2 years of discussing this crap, I can assure it it, or they, have been quite innocently made, and corrected on my first awareness of any error.

Haven't seen you quoting Marshall and Bayard lately. There for awhile you couldn't look at one of these threads without some example of Jeff quoting Marshall as COMPLETELY AGREEING WITH BAYARD, who COMPLETELY AGREED WITH JEFF.

Now that it has been shown that Neither one of them ever agreed with you, your incidence of falsely asserting this claim beyond supportable evidence has dropped to nothing.

You routinely conflate the most ambiguous or innocuous words as having complete and total agreement with your position when in fact, they are either incidental, irrelevant or ambiguous to your argument.

In other words, you have a bad habit of putting your words into the mouths of "Authorities." (And attempting to assert such when they are not.) You conflate one thing to another, then that thing to a third, and then you assert that the first thing is exactly equal to the last thing.

You may be fooling yourself, but you are not fooling anyone else. You simply have a wishful thinking manner of argument and a bad habit of thinking everything you read can be understood as supporting your position when it is at best dubious. You simply lack objectivity and intellectual honesty.

446 posted on 08/21/2013 7:23:40 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson