Replies

To: DiogenesLamp

In 1787 they didn't have split citizenship. Marriage to the father naturalized the mother. Parents were always the same citizenship until 1922.

Now you can say the law was sexist, and it was, but the point still remains that there was NO SUCH THING AS DIVIDED CITIZENSHIP in 1787.

I never said there was.

409 posted on 08/20/2013 3:50:35 PM PDT by Jeff Winston (Yeah, I think I could go with Cruz in 2016.)

To: Jeff Winston

but the point still remains that there was NO SUCH THING AS DIVIDED CITIZENSHIP in 1787.

I never said there was.

Then why on earth should we accept it for Presidential eligibility? It is an unnatural creation of congress, not a characteristic of natural law.

443 posted on 08/21/2013 7:06:57 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794