I know the Constitution, history and the law backwards, forwards and sideways on the meaning of natural born citizen by now. No you don't. You have a misinformed and ignorant understanding of the term "natural born citizen" and you deliberately exclude any evidence which contradicts your preconceived notions.
Stop holding yourself up as an expert. You are the worst kind of misinformer and Deliberate liar.
And I can tell you without the slightest qualification that all of the claims that it takes both birth on US soil plus citizen parents to be a natural born citizen are complete bullsh*t.
Here is the SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA telling you you are absolutely wrong!
In both instances the people who want to believe the bullsh*t listen to the Al Sharptons and the DiogenesLamps, and simply ignore or write off all the evidence that contradicts them, which in both cases is virtually all of it.
Or anyone else other than the Deliberate LIAR Jeff Winston.
Here is the SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA telling you you are absolutely wrong! It doesn't matter how many times you falsely claim that the commentary of Samuel Roberts represented the views of the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania.
It is clear from Roberts' own writing, in which he "presumed" [his own word] to know what the members of that Court would think, from the fact that Roberts actually CRITICIZES the Supreme Court's approach to the issue, and from the fact that Roberts makes no mention whatsoever of the Supreme Court having at any time or in any way sponsored, approved or even READ Roberts' book, that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania had NOTHING AT ALL to do with Roberts' book.
Continuing to repeat the false claim that they did doesn't make it the slightest bit true. Neither does continuing to repeat the false claim that I'm a "liar."
On the other hand, of course, when Bayard states explicitly that Chief Justice Marshall READ HIS BOOK, and that he sent him a letter pointing out one minor error and saying that was the ONLY thing he could find wrong with Bayard's exposition of the Constitution... well, THAT can be completely ignored!
I have said it before, and I will say it again. You are in need of some kind of psychological help.