BPA found not to be harmful.
And yet the study in link 12, published in January of 13 (several months after that forbes article) found just the opposite.
The subsequent study investigated the effects on multiple generations post exposure.
I’ll post a bit of the abstract here:
“Gestating F0 generation females were exposed to either the “plastics” or “lower dose plastics” mixture during embryonic days 8 to 14 of gonadal sex determination and the incidence of adult onset disease was evaluated in F1 and F3 generation rats. There were significant increases in the incidence of total disease/abnormalities in F1 and F3 generation male and female animals from plastics lineages. Pubertal abnormalities, testis disease, obesity, and ovarian disease (primary ovarian insufficiency and polycystic ovaries) were increased in the F3 generation animals.”
f0 is the initial generation. F1’s are their children. F2’s are their grandchildren and f3’s are the great grandchildren.
BPA showed up in the food supply en masse in the late 60’s. We’re just now seeing the f2’s of that exposure being born. I personally know 3 women born in/around the mid/late 70’s who were told in their late 20’s that they had the ovarian capacity of a 40 something woman. Ie, they were infertile at 27.
Of course, mass infertility is a completely desirable side effect of this stuff if you’re a globalist gaia worshipper. Like most of the elites.
But hey, if you think it’s safe, absolutely consume as much of it as you can. Your kids too. Natural selection happens even today. I’m sure the cigarette/health studies were all fearmongering hype too.