Bayard clearly said:
It is only requisite that he should be a citizen by birth.
It is only requisite that he should be a citizen by birth.
But you deliberately leave out the fact that Bayard believes the only way to *BE* a citizen by birth is by having a FATHER who is a citizen.
I told you the very first time you brought this up that the statement by Bayard is correct if you postulate that a Citizen father is a necessity.
United States Secretary of State Thomas F Bayard.
Once again, according to BAYARD's Understanding, if your father wasn't a citizen, you can't be *BORN* a citizen.
Again, I told you the very first time you brought this up. Rather than UNDERSTAND the point, you simply kept repeating your false understanding over and over and over and over again.
No citizen father? No citizen at birth!
GROW UP!
Bayard clearly said:
It is only requisite that he should be a citizen by birth.
Which can only occur if your FATHER is a citizen. Yes. Bayard is very clear about that. Jeff just wants all of us to ignore that crucial detail though.
Bayard clearly said:
It is only requisite that he should be a citizen by birth.
Wrong again. I have seen people take things out of context to prove a point. You have taken that a step further. You put a period where a coma should be and then leave off the rest of the sentence.
, and that is the case with all the children of citizens who have ever resided in this country, though born in a foreign country.
That is where he describes what it takes to be a citizen by birth. All the children born of citizens who have resided in this country.
Obama, Cruz, Rubio and Jindal all fail that requirement. BVB