Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

So lets break this down into specific quesitions:

Do you agree that someone who is a US citizen at birth is not naturalized but in fact, was naturally born a US Citizen?

Do you agree that someone born on US soil/jurisdiction is a US Citizen at birth?

Do you agree that US Citizenship at birth can be obtained even if born outside the boundaries of the United States?


108 posted on 08/19/2013 11:39:11 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

Pub. L. 82-414 § 301(a)(7), Pub. L. 82-414 § 301(b); (66 Stat. 163, 236)

Cruz is defined by law “citizen”


111 posted on 08/19/2013 11:45:06 AM PDT by Ray76 (Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

No.

Does not matter to subject.

Does not matter to subject.

Just look at the situation with collectively NATURALIZED citizens of Puerto Rico as to how one can can be a ‘citizen at birth’ but still not be a natural born Citizen. The two are not one in the same no matter how much it is desired that that they are. Collective naturalization nullifies the argument completely.

As for Mr. Cruz the article states his birth was registered with the US consulate. What if he had not been? Would he still had been a US citizen?

Why does the referenced website indicate BOTH parents must be Citizens to be a citizen AT birth when born outside US boundaries? Is the website incorrect?


119 posted on 08/19/2013 12:15:43 PM PDT by bluecat6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson