Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
#80 will be built. CVN-79 has already started, and lead time items and logistics for the USS Enterprise are already well under way, along with a lot of funding.

I fully expect that CVN-80 will be built as well.

However I don't believe for a minute it will be named "Enterprise". My guess is that President Hillary Clinton will either rename it the USS Barack Obama, or the USS William Jefferson Clinton.

For reference, please see what happened to CVN-75. This was, I believe, the only carrier named during the Bush (41) Administration. It was laid down as the "USS United States". However Bill Clinton (or, rather, his SecNav ... ) renamed the ship the "USS Harry S Truman" in retaliation for the GOP Congress directing that CVN-76 be named for President Reagan.

Adding insult to injury, the previous ship that was supposed to hold the name USS United States was the first Supercarrier, CVB-58. This ship was summarily cancelled (only a few days after it was laid down) by ... Harry Truman. Because USAF B-36 bombers were better instruments of US policy than USN carriers. It spurred a little thing called "The Revolt of the Admirals".
25 posted on 08/17/2013 11:55:46 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter

The name has already been selected, announced, and approved. It will be the USS Enterprise, announced on the date of the USS Enterprise, CVN-65’s decommissioning.


38 posted on 08/17/2013 10:30:14 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson