[Charles Martel]

That tells me more about you than the article, which is full of half-truths, racist innuendo, and inflammatory fantasy about "Stand Your Ground" laws, which were never at issue in the case.

Martin attacked Zimmerman, NOT THE REVERSE. And for that, Zimmerman was completely justified in killing the little thug. He is in the ground, and the world is better off.

I agree with you one the article's deficiencies and the facts concerning how that attack happened - but the writer isn't trying to reach *us*. Unfortunately, he's wasting his time trying to open the eyes of people who bought the Ben Crump/Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson narrative.

[Bryan24]

You don’t “reach people” by re-enforcing their misinformation. The only way these people will be reached if for the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons to stand up and say “George Zimmerman did nothing wrong.”