Hillary exploded at congressman two days after Benghazi for suggesting attack was work of terrorists

Daily Mail ^ | 8/16/13 | David Martosko

[TigersEye]

“When the US leadership retreats from the world chaos fills the vacuum.”

I read a FReeper remark yesterday which echos a thought that has crossed my mind a few times. To paraphrase; 0bama and his like were re-elected because people wanted to vote for more chaos.

[Eagles6]

"selfishness, self promotion, and the acquisition of power."

Those are the qualities that dems look for in a candidate.

[Grampa Dave]

Clintoon and the head liar in the outhouse, have problems controlling even their liberal media re Benghazi.

There is no way they can control other outlets.

Below is a very interesting and different look at who might have been responsible for the killing of Ambassador Stephens and others at Benghazi, Assad.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/print/former-muslim-brotherhood-member-tells-us-what-the-government-wont-about-the-terror-attack-in-Benghazi

Former Muslim Brotherhood Member tells us what the Government won’t about the Terror Attack in Benghazi
August 12, 2013

Dr. Mark Christian from the Global Faith Institute sent The Gateway Pundit his account of the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012:

Syrian president Bashar el Assad, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah of Lebanon are fully responsible for the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President Obama has known this fact since the minute he first learned about the attack.

Stevens, from his Benghazi base, was stockpiling weapons - and resourcing the expert fighters who could use them - to topple Assad’s rule in Syria. On September 11, 2012, Assad powerfully punched back, raiding the Benghazi compound which housed the armament for his own destruction. Though Assad’s reprisal resulted in the loss of four American lives, including Stevens, he forcefully conveyed that he would not be thrown out of the ring.

The Syrian uprising is not a simple “the good guys vs. the bad guys” action-packed conflict. While there is plenty of action, there are no good guys. There are, however, two opponents who have been duking it out for hundreds of years, the Sunnis and the Shiites. In the Sunni corner, we have U.S. President Barack Obama, championed primarily by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Their combatants, the Shiites, include Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah - the Lebanese militia controlled by Iran and Syria.

Under President Barack Obama’s direction in the 2011 Arab Spring, the Sunnis had already ousted evil dictators from countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. It appeared to be pro-democracy freedom-fighting at its finest. It wasn’t. The overthrown governments were quickly replaced with Muslim-Brotherhood-aligned, Sunni Islamic theocracies. And the next country on the list for overthrow was Syria. But unlike the easier targets of Mubarek, Ben Ali, and Gaddafi, Shiite Syrian leader Bashar Assad has the powerful allies of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia.

The Assad regime was fully aware of the shrouded activity in Benghazi, fully aware that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the man credited for the assassination of Gaddafi, was much more than an ambassador. Though serving in Tripoli as the U.S. Ambassador to transition a tribal Libya to Sunni Islamic rule, Stevens covertly used Benghazi as his base of operation for the next phase of Arab Spring: overthrowing Assad in Syria. From his Benghazi compound Stevens stored and supplied weapons for thousands of hired, rebel fighters - many of which were al-Qaeda - headed to Syria.