Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Unimaginable development. Now, what any homo-group thinks now trumps our freedoms. We are nearing the end.

This case wouldn't be moving forward if the GayGB didn't think they'd win.

1 posted on 08/16/2013 2:56:26 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: fwdude
totally insane

Freedom of speech is dead


47 posted on 08/16/2013 4:05:25 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Michael Posner. Remember that name.


50 posted on 08/16/2013 4:12:19 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Not seeing an actual problem here if we’re being told the whole story and all the preacher did was preach. The defence against dumbass stuff like this is to counter-sue every bunghollio nitwit involved in trumping up the claim. Sue them for harrassment. Sue them for defamation. Sue them for wasting oxygen and whatever else is apparent but sue their hip pockets off.


52 posted on 08/16/2013 4:18:09 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
We are nearing the end

America is finished. The communists and the anti-Christ have dumped America in the drink never to come back.

53 posted on 08/16/2013 4:19:57 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
Remember when all the homos wanted was to have the government out of their bedroom? How did that evolve into Government enforced condoning of sodomy?
54 posted on 08/16/2013 4:31:20 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The Administration set the standard by blaming the 1st Amendment for Benghazi.


55 posted on 08/16/2013 4:36:59 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

What difference does it make? The Constitution means nothing anymore. Both Democrats and Republicans have so distorted the meanings that they have interpreted the Constitution to give them the power to do anything.


57 posted on 08/16/2013 4:37:01 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
[Now, what any homo-group thinks now trumps our freedoms.]
 
But what they [transhumanist/postgenderists] think will never trump several billion years worth of biological human reproductive fact.
 
If we still had a Republic, I might hope for the equivalent of the Skopes monkey trial with with human reproductive fact as the defendent.... IF we still had a Republic.
 
 
Sex, Evolution and Behavior
By Martin Daly and Margo Wilson
 
 
Got Socio-Biological Fitness?
 
 "Gay" penguins don't - not even in the San Francisco zoo
http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=San+Francisco+gay+penguins
 
FAIL.

60 posted on 08/16/2013 5:05:20 PM PDT by TArcher ("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men" -- Does that still work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
“We are disappointed with the decision because we believe SMUG’s claims are firmly foreclosed, not only by the First Amendment right to free speech, but also by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kiobel, which eliminated Alien Tort Statute claims for events that allegedly occurred in foreign nations.”

What? This is what gets me. The pastor's lawyer lends legitimacy to this farce and responds like these are real charges worthy of a response. He is also said he is confident his Client will be vindicated? Well he doesn't have to be vindicated.

The lawyer should have stated the case is absurd and is not worthy of a response.

63 posted on 08/16/2013 5:10:07 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

This should have been stopped back in the 1970s when the Dems put gayhood protection on its party platform. Foolish people in BOTH parties just keep following the clueless social leaders not giving a thought to the implications of where the gay agenda was going. Now you know where it is going and it will continue to go in more and more bizarre directions. Stop making excuses for them—NOW. And that means you mealy mouth Republicans as well. So you don’t think that social (moral) issues really matter?


64 posted on 08/16/2013 5:19:27 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

This should have been stopped back in the 1970s when the Dems put gayhood protection on its party platform. Foolish people in BOTH parties just keep following the clueless social leaders not giving a thought to the implications of where the gay agenda was going. Now you know where it is going and it will continue to go in more and more bizarre directions. Stop making excuses for them—NOW. And that means you mealy mouth Republicans as well. So you don’t think that social (moral) issues really matter?


65 posted on 08/16/2013 5:19:27 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude; HoosierDammit; TYVets; red irish; fastrock; NorthernCrunchyCon; UMCRevMom@aol.com; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

68 posted on 08/16/2013 5:21:36 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Does this mean I can sue somebody like Jerimiah Wright for preaching that white people are evil?


69 posted on 08/16/2013 5:25:24 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Since this is about the rights of foreigners over Christians the question needs answered.

Is Michael Posner a Christian? Or does he as a judge get to use his judicial power only to hurt Christians? That’s been the intent of many on the left for decades. They want to weaken and discredit Anglo Christians. Most of such rulings have benefited illegals, foreigners and non-Christians.


71 posted on 08/16/2013 5:32:09 PM PDT by apoliticalone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Celebrate Perversity!


72 posted on 08/16/2013 5:32:59 PM PDT by windsorknot (>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

This will never hold up in the Supreme Court.


74 posted on 08/16/2013 5:56:50 PM PDT by Maelstorm (If all are treated as suspects it will not be long before we all are treated as prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

It won’t stop at sodomy. Sharia law is next. The fascist porkers are going to be sorry in the long run. Queers won’t do well in Islamic world government. The butt guy card will not trump the Islamic card.


78 posted on 08/16/2013 6:37:54 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

“.......It could establish that an international consensus disavowing long-held biblical standards could trump the U.S. Constitution.”

Like Hell it will. NOT going to happen. We won’t knuckle under to Moozies, or Homo’s.


81 posted on 08/16/2013 7:04:14 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

I’ve met him. He’s a very calm and sane man who speaks with purpose and supports everything he says with facts and historical perspective. Hopefully this decision will be tossed at the next appeal.


83 posted on 08/16/2013 8:35:39 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

New constitutional amendment:

Non-citizens have no standing in any U.S. civil court for any reason excepting for a direct party to a civil contract that’s in dispute for a legal contract signed IN the United States by said party.


84 posted on 08/16/2013 8:39:16 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson