So I guess the founders telling us all the things about voting on principle was all crap huh?
When you can reconcile what they said clearly with electing people who hold their creation in disgust, get back to me.
You won’t find any of the crap in the two sentences you wrote in any of my comments. You brought up Romney, in a preceding comment and got your wish that Obama remain president instead of someone with principles, the direct opposite of the tyrannical dicktator still in charge. I don’t accept the wishful premise and no one with half a brain should or would that Mr Romney would have been anything like the present occupier of the White House. It is not logical to even leap to such a conclusion. The man had not been in public office for years, and he certainly didn’t get a chance to prove otherwise so in reality neither you statement or mine carry much weight.
His record is a mirror of Obamas. Pro gay, pro Abortion, Anti gun control freak.
Before his election, Obama wasn’t a full blown tyrant either. But his record showd him to have that potential. Once elected, he realized that potential. So you think his twin would do any different? Not according to his record he wouldn’t have.
History can be a real problem for his apologists. And making excuses and what ifs is no different. He was and is a liberal and some here wanted him in office.
Conservatives do not make excuses for liberal disasters. If they do and thats the new normal here, then what else are you willing to compromise on so we can have this debate on clear footing?