[Libloather]

"And I also added it's a great way for Clinton to get women. I mean, you ought to see the people that go to this thing."

The New York Times takes down the Clinton Foundation. This could be devastating for Bill and Hillary

Is the New York Times being guest edited by Rush Limbaugh? Today it runs with a fascinating takedown of the Clinton Foundation – that vast vanity project that conservatives are wary of criticising for being seen to attack a body that tries to do good. But the liberal NYT has no such scruples. The killer quote is this:

[Pontiac]

That's what they're saying. How do you get rich running a charity? How does your charity end up owing millions, deficits of multiple millions, when that's what you're receiving in donations?

One thing Rush did not go in to that strikes me as a little strange is what responsible lender will lend money to a charity that despite huge income from donations runs deficits year after year.

Repeated deficits year after year suggest poor management. Poor management suggest a bad risk for a loan.

If a poorly managed charity can get loans year after year it sounds like an insider deal with the lender. This scandal may have deeper roots than just the Clintons milking the charity for fun money.

[dynachrome]

<tinfoil The klintoons are being taken down because obozo has chosen his successor already, and it ain’t hillary. </tinfoil