To: rightwingintelligentsia
Something about Hillary has the Times spooked???
Maybe somebodies are worried about her clearing the table and then having something like Benghazi blow up. At that point the Dems would be really, really screwed.
50 posted on
08/14/2013 10:24:25 AM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Something about Hillary has the Times spooked???The Times might have gotten pissed off because they were forced by Hillary to puff Anthony Weiner.
Who, mah Weiner? Yeah, your Weiner.
58 posted on
08/14/2013 10:32:27 AM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(Beware of the Rip in the Space/Time Continuum)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Maybe he’s right about the NYT backing another Dem candidate.
62 posted on
08/14/2013 10:38:13 AM PDT by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Maybe somebodies are worried about her clearing the table and then having something like Benghazi blow up. At that point the Dems would be really, really screwed.
The fact that Hillary is STILL even a viable candidate at this point says everything one needs to know about the State of our Union....
73 posted on
08/14/2013 10:46:15 AM PDT by
Eagle of Liberty
(Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Maybe somebodies are worried about her clearing the table and then having something like Benghazi blow up. I think it could be something personal involving Huma and Weiner.
76 posted on
08/14/2013 10:48:02 AM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Kill Obamacare not wound it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson